Evaluate published nursing research for credibility and lab significance related to evidence-based practice. (PO #4 and 8)

Discuss a change theory that could be used to implement the process improvement plan developed in B.
November 14, 2020
How & why would you conduct a Grief/Bereavement Assessment?
November 14, 2020

Evaluate published nursing research for credibility and lab significance related to evidence-based practice. (PO #4 and 8)

Evaluate published nursing research for credibility and lab significance related to evidence-based practice. (PO #4 and 8)

Purpose
The student will read research literature to determine the research purpose, question, design, population, sample, limitations, data collection and analysis.
Course Outcomes
This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:
CO 2: Apply research principles to the interpretation of the content of published research studies. (PO #4 and 8)
CO 4: Evaluate published nursing research for credibility and lab significance related to evidence-based practice. (PO #4 and 8)
Points:This assignment isworth 225 points.
Due Date:Submit to the Reading Research Literature basket in the Dropbox by11:59 p.m. MT Sunday at the end of Week 5.
Requirements
1. Download the research articles from the Chamberlain library.
Retrieve the following research articles:Make sure you are viewing the full text PDF. If you view the article in HTML format, you may not be able to see the
tables and figures that are referenced in the questions.
George, S., & Thomas, S. (2010). Lived experience of diabetes among older, rural people. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 66(5), 1092-1100.
http://search.ebscohost.com.proxy.chamberlain.edu:8080/login.aspx?direct=true&db=rzh&AN=2010620411&site=ehost-live
(http://search.ebscohost.com.proxy.chamberlain.edu:8080/login.aspx?direct=true&db=rzh&AN=2010620411&site=ehost-live)
Hunt, C., Sanderson, B., Ellison, K., (2014). Support for diabetes using technology: A pilot study to improve self-management.MedSurg Nursing,23(4), 231-237.
http://proxy.chamberlain.edu:8080/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=rzh&AN=2012695204&site=eds-live
(http://proxy.chamberlain.edu:8080/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=rzh&AN=2012695204&site=eds-live)
2. Download NR439_RRL_form and type answers to the questions directly onto the form. Your paper does NOT need to follow APA formatting; however, you are
expected to use correct grammar, spelling, syntax, and write in complete sentences.
3. Save the file by clicking Save as and adding your last name, e.g., NR439_RRL_Smith.docx.
4. Watch the video on how to complete this assignment. The link may be found on the Week 5 Assignments page.
5. Submit to the Week 5 Reading Research Literature basket in the Dropbox by11:59 p.m. MT Sunday at the end of Week 5. Please post questions about this paper in
the Week 5 Q & A Forum.
 Ask a Question (https://www.hometaskguru.com/question/post)
Search 
Home (https://www.hometaskguru.com/) / Main Subjects (https://www.hometaskguru.com/browse/main)
/ Health Care (https://www.hometaskguru.com/browse/subject/19/Health-Care)
/ General Health Care (https://www.hometaskguru.com/browse/subcategory/253/General-Health-Care) / Question on General Health Care
QUESTION
Inappropriate content? Let us know. (https://www.hometaskguru.com/home/report/q/116773)
DeVry NR439 Week 5 Assignment Reading Research Literature
Asked by sharpie
Dated: 6th Apr’16 02:36 PM
Bounty offered: $24.00
Search for existing questions and tutorials…
Chat live with an
agent now!
Tutor Support – Online
10/9/2017 DeVry NR439 Week 5 Assignment Reading Research Literature – SKU 116773
https://www.hometaskguru.com/question/view/116773/DeVry-NR439-Week-5-Assignment-Reading-Research-Literature 2/4
Grading Criteria
Category Points % Description
Question 1 10 4% Identifies the purpose of the research article.
Question 2 10 4% Identifies the research question implied in the study.
Question 3 10 4% Describes the research design of the study.
Question 4 10 4% Identifies and describes the population.
Question 5 10 4% Was the sample adequate for the research design
Question 6 10 4% Describe the data collection procedure
Question 7 10 4% How were the data analyzed
Question 8 10 4% Describes the limitations in the study.
Question 9 10 4% Describes the authors’ conclusions.
Question 10 10 5% How does this advance knowledge in the field.
Question 11 10 5% Identifies the purpose of the research article.
Question 12 10 5% Identifies the research question implied in the study.
Question 13 10 5% Describes the research design of the study.
Question 14 10 5% Identifies characteristics of quantitative study.
Question 15 10 5% Was the sample adequate for the research design
Question 16 10 5% Describe the data collection procedure
Question 17 10 5% How were the data analyzed
Question 18 10 5% Describes the limitations in the study.
Question 19 10 5% Describes the authors’ conclusions.
Question 20 10 5% How does this advance knowledge in the field.
Style and Writing25 11% Names file, includes name on paper. Writes in complete sentences with no grammar, spelling, or syntax errors.
Total 225 points100%
Grading Rubric
Assignment
Criteria
A
(92-100%)
Outstanding or Highest Level of Performance
B
(84-91%)
Very Good or High Level of
Performance
C
76-83%)
Competent or Satisfactory
Level of Performance
F
0-75%)
Poor or Failing or Unsatisfactory Level
of Performance
Pts
Question 1
Purpose
(10 points)
Correctly identifies the purpose of the research
article.
9–10 points
Mostly identifies the purpose of
the research article.
8 points
Somewhat identifies the
purpose of the research
article.
7 points
Does not answer the question or
provides an incorrect answer.
0–6 points
/10
Question 2
Research
question
(10 points)
Correctly identifies the research question in the
study, or identifies the implied question, or
indicates that no research question was given.
9–10 points
Mostly identifies the research
question that the author
described.
8 points
Somewhat identifies the
research question that the
author described.
7 points
Does not answer or fails to identify the
research question that the author
described.
0–6 points
/10
Question 3
Research
design
(10 points)
Correctly describes the research design of the
study
9–10 points
Mostly describes the research
design of the study.
8 points
Somewhat describes the
research design of the study.
7 points
Does not describe the design of the
study, or inaccurately identifies it.
0–6 points
/10
Question 4
Population
(10 points)
Correctly identifies and describes in detail the
population of the research article.
9–10 points
Mostly describesidentifies and
describes in detail the
population of the research
article.
8 points
Somewhat identifies and
describes in detail the
population of the research
article.
7 points
Does notidentifies and describes in
detail the population of the research
article.
0–6 points
/10
Question 5
Sample
(10 points)
Correctly describes if the sample was adequate
for the research design studied.
9–10 points
Mostly describes if the sample
was adequate for the research
design studied
8 points
Somewhat describes if the
sample was adequate for the
research design studied
7 points
Doesn’t answer the question, or
misunderstands if the sample was
adequate for the research design
studied.
0–6 points
/10
Chat live with an
agent now!
Tutor Support – Online
10/9/2017 DeVry NR439 Week 5 Assignment Reading Research Literature – SKU 116773
https://www.hometaskguru.com/question/view/116773/DeVry-NR439-Week-5-Assignment-Reading-Research-Literature 3/4
Question 6
Data
collection
(10 points)
Correctly describes the data collection procedure.
9–10 points
Mostly describes the data
collection procedure.
8 points
Somewhat describes the data
collection procedure.
7 points
Doesn’t answer the question, or
misunderstands the data collection
procedure.
0–6 points
/10
Question 7
Data
analysis
(10 points)
Correctly describes how the data was analyzed.
9–10 points
Partially describes how the data
was analyzed.
8 points
Minimally describes how the
data was analyzed.
7 points
Incorrectly describes how the data was
analyzed or fails to answer
0–6 points
/10
Question 8
Limitations
(10 points)
Correctlydescribes the limitations in the study.
9–10 points
Mostlydescribes the limitations
in the study
8 points
Somewhat describes the
limitations in the study.
7 points
Incorrectly describes the limitations in
the study or does not answer
0–6 points
/10
Question 9
Conclusions
(10 points)
Correctly describes the authors’ conclusions
9–10 points
Mostly describes the authors’
conclusions
8 points
Somewhat describes the
authors’ conclusions
7 points
Incorrectlydescribes the authors’
conclusions or does not answer
question
0–6 points
/10
Question 10
Advances
knowledge
(10 points)
Correctly describes how this research advances
knowledge in the field.
9–10 points
Mostly describes how this
research advances knowledge
in the field.
8 points
Somewhat describes how this
research advances
knowledge in the field.
7 points
Incorrectlydescribes how this research
advances knowledge in the field or does
not anwer the question.
0–6 points
/10
Question 11
Purpose
(10 points)
Correctly identifies the purpose of the research
article.
9–10 points
Mostly identifies the purpose of
the research article.
8 points
Somewhat identifies the
purpose of the research
article.
7 points
Does not answer the question or
provides an incorrect answer.
0–6 points
/10
Question 12
Research
question
(10 points)
Correctly identifies the research question in the
study, or identifies the implied question, or
indicates that no research question was given.
9–10 points
Mostly identifies the research
question that the author
described.
8 points
Somewhat identifies the
research question that the
author described.
7 points
Does not answer or fails to identify the
research question that the author
described.
0–6 points
/10
Question 13
Research
design
(10 points)
Correctly describes the research design of the
study
9–10 points
Mostly describes the research
design of the study.
8 points
Somewhat describes the
research design of the study.
7 points
Does not describe the design of the
study, or inaccurately identifies it.
0–6 points
/10
Question 14
Population
(10 points)
Correctly identifies and describes in detail the
population of the research article.
9–10 points
Mostly describesidentifies and
describes in detail the
population of the research
article.
8 points
Somewhat identifies and
describes in detail the
population of the research
article.
7 points
Does notidentifies and describes in
detail the population of the research
article.
0–6 points
/10
Question 15
Sample
(10 points)
Correctly describes if the sample was adequate
for the research design studied.
9–10 points
Mostly describes if the sample
was adequate for the research
design studied
8 points
Somewhat describes if the
sample was adequate for the
research design studied
7 points
Doesn’t answer the question, or
misunderstands if the sample was
adequate for the research design
studied.
0–6 points
/10
Question 16
Data
collection
(10 points)
Correctly describes the data collection procedure.
9–10 points
Mostly describes the data
collection procedure.
8 points
Somewhat describes the data
collection procedure.
7 points
Doesn’t answer the question, or
misunderstands the data collection
procedure.
0–6 points
/10
Question 17
Data
Analysis
(10 points)
Correctly describes how the data was analyzed.
9–10 points
Partially describes how the data
was analyzed.
8 points
Minimally describes how the
data was analyzed.
7 points
Incorrectly describes how the data was
analyzed or fails to answer
0–6 points
/10
Question 18
Limitations
(10 points)
Correctlydescribes the limitations in the study.
9–10 points
Mostlydescribes the limitations
in the study
8 points
Somewhat describes the
limitations in the study.
7 points
Incorrectly describes the limitations in
the study or does not answer
0–6 points
/10
Chat live with an
agent now!
Tutor Support – Online
10/9/2017 DeVry NR439 Week 5 Assignment Reading Research Literature – SKU 116773
https://www.hometaskguru.com/question/view/116773/DeVry-NR439-Week-5-Assignment-Reading-Research-Literature 4/4
Question 19
Conclusions
(10 points)
Correctly describes the authors’ conclusions
9–10 points
Mostly describes the authors’
conclusions
8 points
Somewhat describes the
authors’ conclusions
7 points
Incorrectlydescribes the authors’
conclusions or does not answer
question
0–6 points
/10
Question 20
Advances
knowledge
(10 points)
Correctly describes how this research advances
knowledge in the field.
9–10 points
Mostly describes how this
research advances knowledge
in the field.
8 points
Somewhat describes how this
research advances
knowledge in the field.
7 points
Incorrectlydescribes how this research
advances knowledge in the field or does
not anwer the question.
0–6 points
/10
Style and
Writing
(25 pts)
Correctly names file, includes name on paper.
Writes in complete sentences with no grammar,
spelling, or syntax errors.
23–25 points
One to two errors in grammar,
spelling, and syntax.
21–22 points
Three to four errors in
grammar, spelling, and syntax
19–20 points
Five or more errors in grammar,
spelling, and syntax.
0–18 points
/25
Total Points = ____/225

Place your order now for a similar paper and have exceptional work written by our team of experts to guarantee you A Results

ordernowcc-green