Discussion: Accrediting agency competencies
Discussion: Accrediting agency competencies
Submitting a text entry box, a website URL, a media recording, or a file upload
Instructions
Develop a personal philosophy and framework acknowledging professional and accrediting agency competencies relating to the family nurse practitioner’s role and scope of practice. Identify a nurse theorist that aligns with your current/ planned practice and how they provide the foundation for this philosophy development.
Describe the type of educational courses and requirements required for APRN professional certification and licensing within the state where you will practice.
Identify the precise application process for your certification exam, state regulations for applying for prescriptive authority/practice, and issues related to APRN practice within your state.
Evaluate and discuss APRN roles and prescriptive privileges and their impact on client safety and care https://essaypandit.com/essay-papers/
Compare the differences between prescriptive authority, credentialing, and clinical privileges and how each of these impact client safety and care
Evaluate the development of the advanced practice nurse role from a global perspective.
ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPERS
Assignment Guidelines:
1200 – 1500 word paper (not including the cover page and references)
Required APA 7th edition for references and citations
Include a minimum of 6 scholarly references (does not include text or websites), and the majority of references must not be older than five years
Demonstrate analysis, https://theeliteessaywriters.com/blogessays/ evaluation and synthesis of information (see the rubric for specifics)
Estimated time to complete: 6 hours
Rubric
NU 626 Unit 2 APNs and State Regulations Rubric
NU 626 Unit 2 APNs and State Regulations Rubric
Criteria Rating Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent 45 pts
5
Demonstrates a thorough understanding of context, audience, and purpose that is responsive to the assigned task(s) and focuses on all elements of the work. 41 pts
4
Demonstrates adequate consideration of context, audience, and purpose and a clear focus on the assigned task(s) (e.g., the task aligns with audience, purpose, and context). 36 pts
3
Demonstrates awareness of context, audience, purpose, and the assigned tasks(s) (e.g., begins to show awareness of audience’s perceptions and assumptions). 31 pts
2
Demonstrates minimal attention to context, audience, purpose, and the assigned tasks(s) (e.g., the expectation of instructor or self as audience). 27 pts
1
Little to no description of the purpose and contents of the paper. 0 pts
0Discussion: Accrediting agency competencies
Not Attempted
45 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent Development 45 pts
5
Uses appropriate, relevant, and compelling content to illustrate mastery of the subject, conveying the writer’s understanding and shaping the whole work. 41 pts
4
Uses appropriate, relevant, and compelling content to explore ideas within the context of the discipline and shape the whole work. 36 pts
3
Uses appropriate and relevant content to develop and explore ideas through most of the work. 31 pts
2
Uses appropriate and relevant content to develop simple ideas in some parts of the work. 27 pts
1
Little to no description of the purpose and contents of the paper. 0 pts
0
Not Attempted
45 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting 25 pts
5
Demonstrates detailed attention to and successful execution of conventions particular to a specific discipline and writing task (s), including organization, content, presentation, formatting, and stylistic choices. 23 pts
4
Demonstrates consistent use of important conventions particular to a specific discipline and writing task(s), including organization, content, presentation, and stylistic choices. 20 pts
3
Follows expectations appropriate to a specific discipline and writing task(s) for basic organization, content, and presentation. 18 pts
2
Attempts to use a consistent system for basic organization and presentation. 15 pts
1
Lacks evidence of clear, organized, comprehensive writing. 0 pts
0
Not attempted.
25 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA 10 pts
5
Demonstrates skillful use of high-quality, credible, relevant sources to develop ideas appropriate for the discipline and genre of the writing. 9 pts
4
Demonstrates consistent use of credible, relevant sources to support ideas within the discipline and genre of the writing. 8 pts
3
Demonstrates an attempt to use credible and relevant sources to support ideas appropriate for the discipline and genre of the writing. 7 pts
2
Demonstrates an attempt to use sources to support ideas in writing. 6 pts
1
Does not include both APA and In-Text Citations or In-text citations and references are not in APA format. 0 pts
0
Not attempted.
10 pts
Total Points: 125
PreviousNext
Instruction Files
The-description-of-2-2-of-homework_-43423.docx
20.5 KB
sample-of-2-2_-434221.docx