How do legal risks, medical malpractice claims, tort reform, and defensive medicine impact the relationship between healthcare providers and patients?

Analyze the distinction between customer satisfaction and customer loyalty
November 15, 2020
Which things need to be considered before EHR implementation?
November 15, 2020

How do legal risks, medical malpractice claims, tort reform, and defensive medicine impact the relationship between healthcare providers and patients?

How do legal risks, medical malpractice claims, tort reform, and defensive medicine impact the relationship between healthcare providers and patients? Howshould they impact the relationship? Make three suggestions to improve existing healthcare policy based on your analysis of impacts on the provider-patient relationship.

IHP 610 Brief Analysis Paper Guidelines and Rubric
Overview: Throughout the course, you will complete three brief analysis papers. These assignments will prepare you to review a particular case, analyze the
impact of the case from a variety of perspectives, and make a recommendation for the best course of action supported by your analysis. Within each paper, be
sure to address each question in the given prompt and include the following elements:
1. Your analysis of the issue or situation
2. Your assessment of the impact on key stakeholders
3. Your clear recommendations on a course of action or policy
Guidelines for Submission: Brief analysis papers should be 1–2 pages in length with one-inch margins, 12-point font, double spacing, and APA formatting for all
references and in-text citations.
Instructor Feedback: This activity uses an integrated rubric in Blackboard. Students can view instructor feedback in the Grade Center. For more information,
review these instructions.
Critical Elements
Comprehension of
the Issue/Case
Analysis of Impact
on Stakeholders Recommendation Writing Mechanics Exemplary (100%)
Meets “Proficient” criteria and
offers greater insight about the
issue under consideration
Meets “Proficient” criteria with
exceptional detail and identifies
stakeholders or impacts that
may not be obvious upon
reading the prompt
Meets “Proficient” criteria and
includes additional supporting
details to reinforce the
recommendation
Submission is free of errors
related to citations, grammar,
spelling, syntax, and
organization and is presented in
a professional and easy-to-read
format Proficient (88%)
Clearly articulates a good
understanding of the issue
under consideration
Provides analysis of the impact
of the issue on relevant
stakeholders Needs Improvement (75%)
Articulates what is known about
the issue, but is missing detail
and clarity of content
Provides analysis of the impact
of the issue on some of the
stakeholders, but missing key
perspectives Not Evident (0%)
Does not articulate what is
known about the issue under
consideration
Does not demonstrate analysis
of stakeholders impacted by the
issue under consideration Value
30 Develops a clear and relevant
recommendation on the issue
under consideration Develops a recommendation,
but is missing supporting details
or elements to clearly articulate
course of action
Submission has major errors
related to citations, grammar,
spelling, syntax, or organization
that negatively impact
readability and articulation of
main ideas Does not make a relevant
recommendation for a course of
action regarding the policy or
issue
Submission has critical errors
related to citations, grammar,
spelling, syntax, or organization
that obstruct understanding 30 Submission has no major errors
related to citations, grammar,
spelling, syntax, or organization Total 30 10 100%

Place your order now for a similar paper and have exceptional work written by our team of experts to guarantee you A Results

ordernowcc-green