PHI-413 Week 1 ElyseeJoanne Worldview Analysis and Personal Inventory

PHI-413 Week 1 ElyseeJoanne Worldview Analysis and Personal Inventory Example

Worldview Analysis and Personal Inventory

Christian Perspective

Christian spirituality and ethics are based on two tenets: belief in God and objective morality. Any Christian’s viewpoint or opinion would look to the Bible as its primary source. The written revelation of God is often known as the Bible. This is where postmodern relativist theory and medical practice diverge most strongly. Postmodernism is based on the idea that truth and objective reality do not exist. It is hard to think of a concept like this when health therapy is based on facts and solid information regarding illness and disease (Brush, 2021). Furthermore, the medical community works tirelessly to enhance patient outcomes by using data and research to guide practice.

The Christian worldview is consistently moral because it is grounded on the experiences of real people. It exemplifies everything that is contrary to postmodern relativism. To describe the negative reaction to postmodern relativism, researchers Braun & Potgieter (2019) coined the term “value vacuum disorder.” Do you think people and societies are never satisfied with the status quo and never stop searching for more stable ideals and fundamental truths by which to ground themselves? Because healthcare is grounded in reality in some way, it can be challenging to apply postmodern relativist theories to the field. When a patient is asked to describe their own experiences, their subjective accounts are taken seriously. However, providing treatment based on relativist assumptions is neither rational nor moral because such beliefs lack facts and have no connection to reality.

Scientism

Scientism is the belief that all of life’s fundamental problems can be solved via scientific inquiry. For scientists, the ultimate existence and significance of the universe are up to speculation. Christians do not warmly embrace science since it does not account for the phenomena described in the Bible’s account of the beginning of all humankind and the universe (Mazur, 2021). One can argue that Prayer doesn’t work because all that is real are natural objects stretched in a compact chronological space-time framework or that God exists and is a unique creation stretched in space-time, engaging logically with other objects in nature.

Christians tend to downplay the importance of the scientific method. Scientism has few effects on religious belief (Potgieter, 2019). The possibility that God does not exist is abhorrent to Christians. And the idea that God can be found in nature was broadened. Christians generally do not support or even like the idea of space travel. I think it is excellent that there is such a noticeable difference between Christianity, scientism, and the natural sciences. While scientific inquiry leaves room for the possibility of an “other” explanation, the scientism that has come to dominate our culture is fixated on finding a scientific explanation for everything (Roy, 2019).

In the hard sciences, long-held beliefs that have been disproved by subsequent research are not subject to revision as new evidence emerges. This means that data from both the social and natural sciences are susceptible to revision when new evidence becomes available. However, since subjectivism is central to the study of “soft” sciences, it is not unusual for researchers to arrive at contradictory conclusions about the same principle.

My Personal Perspective and Worldview On:

Ultimate Reality

This idea that we are all a sum of our experiences in the world is what we consider to be the ultimate reality. My upbringing and experiences in life have shaped me into who I am. My upbringing has been shaped by many different influences, all of which have contributed to the beliefs, habits, and ways of thinking that I currently hold. Since the two theological beliefs have different conceptions of the number of spouses in a lawful marriage, I would be even more accepting of polygamy if I were a Muslim. If I were a Christian, I would be less accepting. Consequently, the study of ultimate reality considers the impact of personal encounters on rationale, choice, and worldview.

Human Beings

One definition of a human being is “any living entity with a soul.” There are many ways for humans to interact with each other, such as through the use of different languages and sign systems. I believe that every person has the capacity to enjoy life. I also think that after individuals have reached a certain level of self-awareness, whether through religion or some other means, they choose a focal point from which to build a guiding principle. From my perspective, engaging in this sort of behavior shapes one’s moral values. Knowledge comes in many forms, including information, expertise, and experience.

Acquiring knowledge can be accomplished in several ways, including through formal education and life experience. It is extremely potent, and its users report experiencing a noticeable increase in the intensity of their corresponding positive or negative energy. Each person misses out on the full advantages of all available information. In most cases, this positively impacts our academic or professional standing, but exceptions exist. Among my goals in life is to increase my knowledge in areas that will make me a better person, parent, and worker. My moral compass points me in the right direction.

Nature of the Universe

Everything in the universe is connected in some way through space and time. The psychic-spiritual nature of the universe has always been present. Rather than being a bunch of things, the cosmos is a community of living, breathing people. The transformation of the world is powered by energy, with the rate and course of transformation being set by biological evolution, natural selection, rivalry, and thermodynamic efficiency. Fighting for access to limited energy forms is a major rivalry component. As time passes, I’ve come to appreciate why it’s crucial to take seriously what scientists have to say about the world and what the word “God” means in context.

Knowledge

In my perception, knowledge refers to the state of being familiar with something on a deep level due to prior exposure or study. Education entails participating in both structured and informal operations to obtain theoretical information, whereas experience is practicing said knowledge to become comfortable with it. The ability to think critically is a byproduct of education and experience. A person well-versed in architecture, for example, may oversee the completion of a building, while a doctorate-holding medical expert can identify and treat illness. In contrast, it is crucial to recognize that not all information now available to humans is beneficial since some actually have a harmful effect. Research has shown that expanding one’s horizons of knowledge leads to greater success in school and the workplace.

Basis of Ethics

The moral core, in my view, is analogous to the earth’s center of mass. This description comes totally from my own experience, in which I have found that whenever I am faced with an ethical problem, there is always some force prompting me to depend on a specific approach. Because His presence convicts us to flow in certain directions, I believe this is wholly the outcome of God and my connection with God. Although everyone has a sense of right and evil, our choices truly reveal our ethics.

Purpose of my Existence

My highest calling is to honor God, build meaningful connections with others, and speak up for people who cannot do so on their own. In addition, I hope that how I conduct my life will positively impact others around me and even contribute to the greater good. As a result, I’ve made the conscious decision to ignore the negativity and instead focus on doing what’s right. So, I want to devote all my time and effort to spreading goodness and exemplifying admirable qualities to all the other living things in the universe.

As a society, we tend to ignore the bad and focus instead on the good, but I would advise the wrongdoers to see the truth if they truly want to. Due to my exposure to the negative aspects of life, I can now appreciate the blessings in my life. Despite the enormous difficulties I’ve faced during this dark time, I’ve decided to provide recognition of what has happened and what might follow. And since my life’s significance is ever-changing as I learn more about myself, I’ll never stop praising God for shaping me into the person I am today. I will also encourage people to embrace this bright, hopeful vibe.

References

Braun, G. J., & Potgieter, F. J. (2019). The worldview of the pilgrim and the foundation of a confessional and narrative philosophy of education. HTS Theological Studies, 75(4).

Brush, J. E. (2021). The Blind Watch: Technological Atheism and the Theology of Nature (Vol. 8). LIT Verlag Münster.

Mazur, L. B. (2021). The epistemic imperialism of science. Reinvigorating early critiques of scientism. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 609823. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.609823

Potgieter, F. J. (2019). Towards a narrative vision for philosophy of education: Postmodernism, the pilgrim, and the journey. Bulgarian Comparative Education Society.

Roy C. (2019). Nursing knowledge in the 21st century: Domain-derived and basic science practice-shaped. ANS. Advances in Nursing Science, 42(1), 28–42. https://doi.org/10.1097/ANS.0000000000000240

NRS PHI-413V-O500 WEEK 1 Worldview Analysis and Personal Inventory

View Rubric

Requires Lopeswrite

Assessment Description

Based on the required topic Resources, write a reflection about worldview and respond to following:

In 250-300 words, explain the Christian perspective of the nature of spirituality and ethics in contrast to the perspective of postmodern relativism within health care.
In 250-300 words, explain what scientism is and describe two of the main arguments against it.
In 750-1,000 words, answer each of the worldview questions according to your own personal perspective and worldview:

1. What is ultimate reality?

1. What is the nature of the universe?

1. What is a human being?

1. What is knowledge?

1. What is your basis of ethics?

1. What is the purpose of your existence?

Remember to support your reflection with the topic Resources.

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

REFERENCES MUST BE BETWEEN 2019-2023

RUBRIC Worldview Analysis and Personal Inventory – Rubric

Christian Perspective of Spirituality and Ethics in Contrast to Postmodern Relativism

Criteria Description

Christian Perspective of Spirituality and Ethics in Contrast to Postmodern Relativism

Explanation of the Christian perspective of the nature of spirituality and ethics in contrast to the perspective of postmodern relativism is clear, detailed, and demonstrates a deep understanding of the subject. Explanation is supported by topic study materials.

Scientism and Arguments

Criteria Description

Scientism and Arguments

Explanation of scientism is clear and accurate. Explanations of two main arguments against scientism are clear and insightful. Details are clearly supported by topic study materials.

Personal Perspective and Worldview

Criteria Description

Personal Perspective and Worldview

Each of the worldview questions is answered clearly and with deep personal insight.

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

Criteria Description

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

Documentation of Sources

Criteria Description

Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

Resources

Practicing Dignity: An Introduction to Christian Values and Decision-Making in Health Care

Read Chapters 1 from Practicing Dignity

View Resource

Faith and Spiritual Decision-Making in Health Care Professions

View both “Faith and Spiritual Decision-Making in Health Care Professions” video messages to RN to BSN students from Dr. Lisa Smi

Literary Styles in the Bible

View “Literary Styles in the Bible” on the Bible Project website (2018).

https://thebibleproject.com/videos/literary-styles-bible/

The Story of the Bible

View “The Story of the Bible” on the Bible Project website (2018).

https://thebibleproject.com/videos/the-story-of-the-bible/

What Is the Bible?

View “What Is the Bible?” on the Bible Project website (2018).

https://thebibleproject.com/videos/what-is-bible/

What Is Scientism?

Read “What Is Scientism?” by Burnett, on the American Association for the Advancement of Science website (2018).

https://www.aaas.org/programs/dialogue-science-ethics-and-religion/what-scientism

10 Things You Should Know About Scientism

Read “10 Things You Should Know About Scientism,” by Moreland, on the Crossway website (2018).

https://www.crossway.org/articles/10-things-you-should-know-about-scientism/

Optional – Topic 1: Optional Resources

For additional information, see the “Topic 1: Optional Resources” that are recommended.

PHI-413V-RS-T1OptionalResources.docx

Topic 1: Optional Resources

The Folly of Scientism

“The Folly of Scientism,” by Hughes, from New Atlantis: A Journal of Technology & Society (2012).

https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=84015008&site=ehost-live&scope=site

Blinded by Scientism

“Blinded by Scientism,” by Feser, on the Public Ciscourse: The Journal of the Witherspoon Institute website (2010).

https://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/2010/03/1174/

Is There Truth Beyond Science

“Is There Truth Beyond Science,” by Hutchinson and the Veritas Forum (2013).

http://www.veritas.org/playlist/is-there-truth-beyond-science/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dtB_gnBDq5E&feature=youtu.be

Time for Truth

“Time for Truth,” by Guinness and the Veritas Forum (2018).

http://www.veritas.org/time-for-truth-os/

NRS PHI-413V-O500 WEEK 2 Case Study on Moral Status

View Rubric

Requires Lopeswrite

Assessment Description

Based on “Case Study: Fetal Abnormality” and the required topic Resources, write a 750-1,000-word reflection that answers the following questions:

What is the Christian view of the nature of human persons, and which theory of moral status is it compatible with? How is this related to the intrinsic human value and dignity?
Which theory or theories are being used by Jessica, Marco, Maria, and Dr. Wilson to determine the moral status of the fetus? What from the case study specifically leads you to believe that they hold the theory you selected?
How does the theory determine or influence each of their recommendations for action?
What theory do you agree with? Why? How would that theory determine or influence the recommendation for action?

Remember to support your responses with the topic Resources.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

Attachments

PHI-413V-RS-T2CaseStudyFetalAbnormality.docx

Rubric Criteria

Christian View of the Nature of Human Persons and Compatible Theory of Moral Status

Explanation of the Christian view of the nature of human persons and the theory of moral status that it is compatible with is clear, thorough, and explained with a deep understanding of the relationship to intrinsic human value and dignity. Explanation is supported by topic study materials.

Determination of Moral Status

Criteria Description

Determination of Moral Status

The theory or theories that are used by each person to determine the moral status of the fetus is explained clearly and draws insightful relevant conclusions. Rationale for choices made is clearly supported by topic study materials and case study examples.

Recommendation for Action

Criteria Description

Recommendation for Action

Explanation of how the theory determines or influences each of their recommendations for action is clear, insightful, and demonstrates a deep understanding of the theory and its impact on recommendation for action. Explanation is supported by topic study materials.

Personal Response to Case Study

Criteria Description

Personal Response to Case Study

Evaluation of which theory is preferable within personal practice along with how that theory would influence personal recommendations for action is clear, relevant, and insightful.

Organization, Effectiveness, and Format

Criteria Description

Organization, Effectiveness, and Format

Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

Documentation of Sources

Criteria Description

Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)

RESSOURCES

Practicing Dignity: An Introduction to Christian Values and Decision-Making in Health Care

Read Chapters 2 from Practicing Dignity.

View Resource

Philosophy – Ethics: Moral Status

View the video “Philosophy – Ethics: Moral Status,” by Jeff Sebo, from Wireless Philosophy.

The Image of God, Bioethics, and Persons with Profound Intellectual Disabilities

Read the attached article, “The Image of God, Bioethics, and Persons With Profound Intellectual Disabilities,” by Devan Stahl and

JCID 6.1-6.2 – Article – D. Stahl_J.Kilner – Image of God Bioethics and PWIDs.pdf

Optional – Topic 2: Optional Resources

For additional information, see the “Topic 2: Optional Study Resources” that are recommended.

PHI-413V-RS-T2OptionalResources.docx

Optional – Joni and Friends

For additional information, the Joni and Friends website is recommended:

https://www.joniandfriends.org/

Case Study: Fetal Abnormality

Jessica is a 30-year-old immigrant from Mexico City. She and her husband Marco have been in the United States for the last three years and have finally earned enough money to move out of their Aunt Maria’s home and into an apartment of their own. They are both hard workers. Jessica works 50 hours a week at a local restaurant and Marco has been contracting side jobs in construction. Six months before their move to an apartment, Jessica finds out she is pregnant.

Four months later, Jessica and Marco arrive at the county hospital, a large, public, nonteaching hospital. A preliminary ultrasound indicates a possible abnormality with the fetus. Further scans are conducted, and it is determined that the fetus has a rare condition in which it has not developed any arms and will not likely develop them. There is also a 25% chance that the fetus may have Down syndrome.

Dr. Wilson, the primary attending physician, is seeing Jessica for the first time, since she and Marco did not receive earlier prenatal care over concerns about finances. Marco insists that Dr. Wilson refrain from telling Jessica the scan results, assuring him that he will tell his wife himself when she is emotionally ready for the news. While Marco and Dr. Wilson are talking in another room, Aunt Maria walks into the room with a distressed look on her face. She can tell that something is wrong and inquires of Dr. Wilson. After hearing of the diagnosis, she walks out of the room wailing loudly and praying aloud.

Marco and Dr. Wilson continue their discussion, and Dr. Wilson insists that he has an obligation to Jessica as his patient and that she has a right to know the diagnosis of the fetus. He furthermore is intent on discussing all relevant factors and options regarding the next step, including abortion. Marco insists on taking some time to think of how to break the news to Jessica, but Dr. Wilson, frustrated with the direction of the conversation, informs the husband that such a choice is not his to make. Dr. Wilson proceeds back across the hall, where he walks in on Aunt Maria awkwardly praying with Jessica and phoning the priest. At that point, Dr. Wilson gently but briefly informs Jessica of the diagnosis and lays out the option for abortion as a responsible medical alternative, given the quality of life such a child would have. Jessica looks at him and struggles to hold back her tears.

Jessica is torn between her hopes of a better socioeconomic position and increased independence, along with her conviction that all life is sacred. Marco will support Jessica in whatever decision she makes but is finding it difficult not to view the pregnancy and the prospects of a disabled child as a burden and a barrier to their economic security and plans. Dr. Wilson lays out all of the options but clearly makes his view known that abortion is “scientifically” and medically a wise choice in this situation. Aunt Maria pleads with Jessica to follow through with the pregnancy and allow what “God intends” to take place and urges Jessica to think of her responsibility as a mother.

WEEK 3 NRS PHI 413 Case Study on Biomedical Ethics in the Christian Narrative

Assessment Traits

Requires Lopeswrite

Assessment Description

This assignment will incorporate a common practical tool in helping clinicians begin to ethically analyze a case. Organizing the data in this way will help you apply the four principles and four boxes approach.

Based on the “Case Study: Healing and Autonomy” and other required topic Resources, you will complete the “Applying the Four Principles: Case Study” document that includes the following:

Part 1: Chart

This chart will formalize the four principles and four boxes approach and the four-boxes approach by organizing the data from the case study according to the relevant principles of biomedical ethics: autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and justice.

Part 2: Evaluation

This part includes questions, to be answered in a total of 500 words, that describe how principalism would be applied according to the Christian worldview.

Remember to support your responses with the topic Resources.

APA style is not required, but solid academic writing is expected.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

Attachments

PHI-413V-RS-T3T5CaseStudyHealingAndAutonomy.docx PHI-413V-RS-T3ApplyingFourPrinciplesCaseStudy.docx

RESSOURCES

Practicing Dignity: An Introduction to Christian Values and Decision-Making in Health Care

Read Chapters 3 from Practicing Dignity.

View Resource

Incorporating Spirituality into Patient Care

Read “Incorporating Spirituality into Patient Care,” by Orr, from American Medical Association Journal of Ethics (2015).

New Testament Overview

View the online video, “New Testament Overview,” from the Bible Project, located on the YouTube website (2018

Read Scripture: TaNaK/Old Testament

View the online video, “Read Scripture: TaNaK/Old Testament,” from the Bible Project, located on the YouTube website (2

Sacrifice and Atonement

Explore “Sacrifice and Atonement” webpage and watch the video, on the Bible Project website (2018).

https://thebibleproject.com/explore/sacrifice-atonement/

The Messiah

Explore “The Messiah” webpage and watch the video on the Bible Project website (2018).

https://thebibleproject.com/explore/the-messiah/

Understanding Health and Healing

View the “Understanding Health and Healing” media piece.

https://www.gcumedia.com/tncc/whole-person-care/understanding/

Word Study: Khata/Sin

View the online video, “Word Study: Khata/Sin,” from the Bible Project, located on the YouTube website (2018).

Word Study: Shalom/Peace

View the online video, “Word Study: Shalom/Peace,” from the Bible Project, located on the YouTube website (2017).

Optional – Topic 3: Optional Resources

For additional information, see the “Topic 3: Optional Resources” that are recommended.

PHI-413V-RS-T3OptionalResources.docx

Case Study: Healing and Autonomy

Mike and Joanne are the parents of James and Samuel, identical twins born 8 years ago. James is currently suffering from acute glomerulonephritis, kidney failure. James was originally brought into the hospital for complications associated with a strep throat infection. The spread of the A streptococcus infection led to the subsequent kidney failure. James’s condition was acute enough to warrant immediate treatment. Usually cases of acute glomerulonephritis caused by strep infection tend to improve on their own or with an antibiotic. However, James also had elevated blood pressure and enough fluid buildup that required temporary dialysis to relieve.

The attending physician suggested immediate dialysis. After some time of discussion with Joanne, Mike informs the physician that they are going to forego the dialysis and place their faith in God. Mike and Joanne had been moved by a sermon their pastor had given a week ago, and also had witnessed a close friend regain mobility when she was prayed over at a healing service after a serious stroke. They thought it more prudent to take James immediately to a faith healing service instead of putting James through multiple rounds of dialysis. Yet, Mike and Joanne agreed to return to the hospital after the faith healing services later in the week, and in hopes that James would be healed by then.

Two days later the family returned and was forced to place James on dialysis, as his condition had deteriorated. Mike felt perplexed and tormented by his decision to not treat James earlier. Had he not enough faith? Was God punishing him or James? To make matters worse, James’s kidneys had deteriorated such that his dialysis was now not a temporary matter and was in need of a kidney transplant. Crushed and desperate, Mike and Joanne immediately offered to donate one of their own kidneys to James, but they were not compatible donors. Over the next few weeks, amidst daily rounds of dialysis, some of their close friends and church members also offered to donate a kidney to James. However, none of them were tissue matches.

James’s nephrologist called to schedule a private appointment with Mike and Joanne. James was stable, given the regular dialysis, but would require a kidney transplant within the year. Given the desperate situation, the nephrologist informed Mike and Joanne of a donor that was an ideal tissue match, but as of yet had not been considered—James’s brother Samuel.

Mike vacillates and struggles to decide whether he should have his other son Samuel lose a kidney or perhaps wait for God to do a miracle this time around. Perhaps this is where the real testing of his faith will come in? Mike reasons, “This time around it is a matter of life and death. What could require greater faith than that?”

WEEK 4 PHI 413 Assessment Description

The practice of health care providers at all levels brings you into contact with people from a variety of faiths. This calls for knowledge and understanding of a diversity of faith expressions; for the purpose of this course, the focus will be on the Christian worldview.

Based on “Case Study: End of Life Decisions,” the Christian worldview, and the worldview questions presented in the required topic Resources you will complete an ethical analysis of George’s situation and his decision from the perspective of the Christian worldview.

Provide a 1,500-2,000-word ethical analysis while answering the following questions:

How would George interpret his suffering in light of the Christian narrative, with an emphasis on the fallenness of the world?
How would George interpret his suffering in light of the Christian narrative, with an emphasis on the hope of resurrection?
As George contemplates life with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), how would the Christian worldview inform his view about the value of his life as a person?
What sorts of values and considerations would the Christian worldview focus on in deliberating about whether or not George should opt for euthanasia?
Given the above, what options would be morally justified in the Christian worldview for George and why?
Based on your worldview, what decision would you make if you were in George’s situation?

Remember to support your responses with the topic Resources.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

Attachments

PHI-413V-RS-T4CaseStudyEndOfLifeDecisions.docx

RESSOURCES

Practicing Dignity: An Introduction to Christian Values and Decision-Making in Health Care

Read Chapters 4 from Practicing Dignity.

View Resource

Euthanasia

Read “Euthanasia,” by Wells, Frey, and Cataldo, from Gale Encyclopedia of Nursing and Allied Health (2013).

https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.credoreference.com/content/entry/galegnaah/euthanasia/0?institutionId=5865

Optional – Topic 4: Optional Resources

For additional information, see the “Topic 4: Optional Resources” that are recommended.

PHI-413V-RS-T4OptionalResources.docx

RUBRIC

Skip to main contentEnable accessibility for visually impairedOpen the accessibility menuOpen the Accessible Navigation Menu

Case Study on Death and Dying – Rubric

Suffering and Fallenness of the World

Criteria Description

Suffering and Fallenness of the World

Analysis of how the man would interpret his suffering in light of the Christian narrative and the fallenness of the world is clear and demonstrates a deep understanding that is skillfully supported by topic study materials.

Suffering and the Hope of Resurrection

Criteria Description

Suffering and the Hope of Resurrection

Analysis of how the man would interpret his suffering in light of the Christian narrative and the hope of resurrection is clear and demonstrates a deep understanding that is skillfully supported by topic study materials.

Value of Life

Criteria Description

Value of Life

Analysis of how the Christian worldview of the man might inform his view about the value of his life as a person with ALS is clear and demonstrates a deep understanding that is skillfully supported by topic study materials.

Euthanasia

Criteria Description

Euthanasia

Evaluation of which values and considerations the Christian worldview focuses on when deliberating the option of euthanasia for the man is clear and demonstrates a deep understanding that is skillfully supported by topic study materials.

Morally Justified Option

Criteria Description

Morally Justified Options

Evaluation of which options would be justified in the Christian worldview for the man is clear and demonstrates a deep understanding that is skillfully supported by topic study materials.

Personal Decision

Criteria Description

Personal Decision

Reflection hypothesis of which personal choices would be make if faced with ALS based on personal worldview is clear, relevant, and insightful.

Good Thesis Development and Purpose

Criteria Description

Thesis Development and Purpose

Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.

Argument Logic and Construction

Criteria Description

Argument Logic and Construction

Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

Criteria Description

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

1Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

Criteria Description

Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

Documentation of Sources

Criteria Description

Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)

WEEK 5 PHI 413 Benchmark – Patient’s Spiritual Needs: Case Analysis

View Rubric

Benchmark

Requires Lopeswrite

Assessment Description

In addition to the topic Resources, use the chart you completed and questions you answered in the Topic 3 about “Case Study: Healing and Autonomy” as the basis for your responses in this assignment.

Answer the following questions about a patient’s spiritual needs in light of the Christian worldview.

In 200-250 words, respond to the following: Should the physician allow Mike to continue making decisions that seem to him to be irrational and harmful to James, or would that mean a disrespect of a patient’s autonomy? Explain your rationale.
In 400-500 words, respond to the following: How ought the Christian think about sickness and health? How should a Christian think about medical intervention? What should Mike as a Christian do? How should he reason about trusting God and treating James in relation to what is truly honoring the principles of beneficence and nonmaleficence in James’s care?
In 200-250 words, respond to the following: How would a spiritual needs assessment help the physician assist Mike determine appropriate interventions for James and for his family or others involved in his care?

Remember to support your responses with the topic Resources.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

Benchmark Information

This benchmark assignment assesses the following programmatic competencies:

BS in Health Sciences 1.2; BS Nursing (RN to BSN ) 5.2

Assess for the spiritual needs and provide appropriate interventions for individuals, families, and groups.

Attachments

PHI-413V-RS-T3T5CaseStudyHealingAndAutonomy.docx

Rubric Criteria

Decision-Making and Principle of Autonomy

Criteria Description

Decision-Making and Principle of Autonomy

Decisions that need to be made by the physician and the father are analyzed from both perspectives with a deep understanding of the complexity of the principle of autonomy. Analysis is supported by the case study, topic study materials, or Topic 3 assignment responses.

Decision-Making, Christian Perspective, and the Principles of Beneficence and Nonmaleficence

Criteria Description

Decision-Making, Christian Perspective, and the Principles of Beneficence and Nonmaleficence

Decisions that need to be made by the physician and the father are clearly analyzed with details according to the Christian perspective and the principles of beneficence and nonmaleficence. Analysis is supported by the case study, topic study materials, or Topic 3 assignment responses.

Spiritual Needs Assessment and Intervention

Criteria Description

Spiritual Needs Assessment and Intervention (C1.2, 5.2)

How a spiritual needs assessment would help the physician assist the father determine appropriate interventions for his son, his family, or others involved in the care of his son is clearly analyzed with a deep understanding of the connection between a spiritual needs assessment and providing appropriate interventions. Analysis is supported by the case study, topic study materials, or Topic 3 assignment responses.

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

Criteria Description

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

Excellent

10 points

Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

Documentation of Sources

Criteria Description

Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)

Resources

Practicing Dignity: An Introduction to Christian Values and Decision-Making in Health Care

Read Chapters 5 from Practicing Dignity.

View Resource

GCU Technical Support – Field Experience Site Information Form

Refer to the “Field Experience Site Information Form” page in the GCU Technical Support Help Center for further instructions from

Doing a Culturally Sensitive Spiritual Assessment: Recognizing Spiritual Themes and Using the HOPE Questions

Read “Doing a Culturally Sensitive Spiritual Assessment: Recognizing Spiritual Themes and Using the HOPE Questions,” by Anan

End of Life and Sanctity of Life, Commentary 1

Read “End of Life and Sanctity of Life,, Commentary 1,” by Reichman, from American Medical Association Journal of Ethics

Assessing the Spiritual Needs of Patients

Read ” Assessing the Spiritual Needs of Patients” by Timmins and Caldeira, from Nursing Standard(2017).

https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search-proquest-com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/docview/1877957457?accountid=7374

Optional – Topic 5: Optional Resources

For additional information, see the “Topic 5: Optional Resources” that are recommended.

PHI-413V-RS-T5OptionalResources.docx