summerize and critical discssion for article Order Description 1. General: How original is this paper? For example, is it simply applying the methods used in another study to a new situation or is the idea completely novel? Are there any published studies on the same topic? What is unique about this study? How important is this study to medical microbiology? Are there any sections of the paper that are too long and could be shortened? Is the writing clear, simple and concise? Is there any incorrect use of bacterial names? 2. Title Does the title reflect the content of the paper? Is it clear and an appropriate length? 3. Abstract Does the abstract outline the aims of the study, main methods, results and conclusions? 4. Introduction Does the introduction state the research question to be addressed? Is sufficient background information provided for readers to understand the question? 5. Materials and methods Are the methods appropriate to the research question/s being addressed? Are the methods described in sufficient detail to be repeated by another microbiologist? Is any important information missing? Are there any well-known methods that are given in detail, but could be replaced by a reference? Have references been provided for all the methods, except new ones developed by the authors? 6. Results Have the authors presented only their own results in this section? Any comparison with the results of other scientists does not belong in the results section. Are there any results in the text that would be better presented in a table or figure? Is there any material presented in a table or figure that would be better presented in the text? Is there any repetition of results in text AND a table or figure? 7. Discussion Do you agree with the authors interpretation of results? Have the authors clearly distinguished between their own results and the results of others? Are there any negative findings in the results that could be important but have not been discussed? Have the authors adequately discussed their results and conclusions in relation to the results of other investigators? Are the authors conclusions acceptable and is there sufficient evidence for the conclusions they have drawn? 8. References Check that all statements in the text that require a reference are properly referenced. Are there any references that are less relevant to the study and could be omitted? 9. Tables and figures Do all tables and figures have complete legends so that they can be understood without reference to the text? Could any of the tables and figures be omitted or simplified? Comment on the design and quality of the tables and figures.