write a critical appraisal of the article you selected in Research Portfolio A.

September 5, 2021
Briefly consider the challenges of introducing a small change in a healthcare settings Think about how you will get people ‘on board’ with your change proposal… (shared core values)
September 11, 2021

write a critical appraisal of the article you selected in Research Portfolio A.

write a critical appraisal of the article you selected in Research Portfolio A.


Assessment Two Task Questions ALL section MUST be Answer

Section A: Is the basic study design valid for a randomized controlled trial?

  1. 1. Did the study address a clearly focused research question?


Was the study designed to assess the outcomes of an intervention?

Is the research question ‘focused’ in terms of:

  • Population studied
  • Intervention given
  • Comparator chosen
  • Outcomes measured?


  1. Was the assignment of participants to interventions randomized?


  • How was randomization carried out? Was the method appropriate?
  • Was randomization sufficient to eliminate systematic bias?
  • Was the allocation sequence concealed from investigators and participants?


  1. Were all participants who entered the study accounted for at its conclusion?


  • Were losses to follow-up and exclusions after randomization accounted for?
  • Were participants analyzed in the study groups to which they were randomized (intention-to-treat analysis)?
  • Was the study stopped early? If so, what was the reason?


          Section B: Was the study methodologically sound?

  1. • Were the participants ‘blind’ to the intervention they were given?
  • Were the investigators ‘blind’ to the intervention they were giving to participants?
  • Were the people assessing/analyzing outcome/s ‘blinded’?


  1. Were the study groups similar at the start of the randomized controlled trial?


  • Were the baseline characteristics of each study group (e.g. age, sex, socio-economic group) clearly set out?
  • Were there any differences between the study groups that could affect the outcome/s?
  1. Apart from the experimental intervention, did each study group receive the same level of care (that is, were they treated equally)?


  • Was there a clearly defined study protocol?
  • If any additional interventions were given (e.g. tests or treatments), were they similar

between the study groups?

  • Were the follow-up intervals the same for each study group

                             Section C: What are the results?

  1. Were the effects of intervention reported comprehensively?


  • Was a power calculation undertaken?
  • What outcomes were measured, and were they clearly specified?
  • How were the results expressed? For binary outcomes, were relative and

absolute effects reported?

  • Were the results reported for each outcome in each study group at each

follow-up interval?

  • Was there any missing or incomplete data?
  • Was there differential drop-out between the study groups that could affect the results?
  • Were potential sources of bias identified?
  • Which statistical tests were used?
  • Were p values reported?


  1. Was the precision of the estimate of the intervention or treatment effect reported?


  • Were confidence intervals (CIs) reported?
  1. Do the benefits of the experimental intervention outweigh the harms and costs?


  • What was the size of the intervention or treatment effect?
  • Were harms or unintended effects reported for each study group?
  • Was a cost-effectiveness analysis undertaken? (Cost-effectiveness analysis

allows a comparison to be made between different interventions used in the care of the same condition or problem).


Section D: Will the results help locally?

  1. Can the results be applied to your local population/in your context?


  • Are the study participants similar to the people in your care?
  • Would any differences between your population and the study participants alter the outcomes reported in the study?
  • Are the outcomes important to your population?
  • Are there any outcomes you would have wanted information on that have not been studied or reported?
  • Are there any limitations of the study that would affect your decision?


  1. Would the experimental intervention provide greater value to the people in your care than any of the existing interventions?


  • What resources are needed to introduce this intervention taking into account time, finances, and skills development or training needs?
  • Are you able to disinvest resources in one or more existing interventions in order to be able to re-invest in the new intervention?


APPRAISAL SUMMARY: Record key points from your critical appraisal in this box. What is your conclusion about the paper? Would you use it to change your practice or to recommend changes to care/interventions used by your organization? Could you judiciously implement this intervention without delay?


Place your order now for a similar paper and have exceptional work written by our team of experts to guarantee you A Results